Thanks Sir, I'm in the viruses are an illusion camp...thanks for your honesty...ICU RN x 40 years much in Critical care...4 children 30yrs old avg age unvaccinated...Viruses are a fraud...Measles 95 % disappeared when they came out with the magic vacccine....same for polio......Environmental causation likely
Mike, I've been following Kaufman, Cowan, Sam and Mark Bailey, the great investigative reporter- Jon Rappaport and many others for the past two years. More and more people are entering the no virus camp. I'm encouraged by this momentum.
Looking back at germ theory, I find it incredible that over a hundred years ago, a bunch of elites had the foresight to see the potential for controlling others through this mechanism. This is on par with central banking and the fractional reserve system. An inquiry into a detailed origin of germ theory would be fascinating and would garner my support. There had to be financial backers to Pasteur while simultaneously working to discredit Bechamp. But I'm enthralled by the genius, albeit evil, at play here!
I'll be reading your posts. And at some point will subscribe to your service.
I have many, many, many questions. But I will limit myself to two.
One question. We "know" (or we believe we know) that pathogenic viruses do not exist, because the evidence that supports the claim that they do has been refuted. Yet the idea of a virus is believed by almost everyone, to the point that they believe, perhaps without evidence, that there are synthetic viruses. Is it possible to make synthetic viruses if real viruses do not exist?
It seems wrong to try to explain a totally man-made agent of disease in terms of something that does not exist in nature.
"This object is analogous to that other object that does not exist."
Another way to present the same question: have humans managed to create an organic particle that is replication-capable according to the current understanding of the "central dogma of genetics" but has no ancestor in nature?
The second question is more speculative. I see the majority of scientists believe (they hate that word, for some reason) that natural, pathogenic viruses exist and have always existed. They even claim that humans and all life forms have co-evolved with viruses.
This majority of learned people must have taken the time to review the evidence, just to be sure, and have found it good enough.
There is a minority of people who think the opposite: they have reviewed the evidence and find it lacking.
My speculative question is: what is one group seeing that the other group cannot or will not see?
It's too easy, and perhaps true, that the "love of money" is involved in some ways. Or perhaps ignorance, intellectual laziness, fear.
About fear: there are lawyers in multi-year long lawsuits against big companies claiming that their crappy vaccines force natural viruses to become more virulent, more pathogenic and deadly, and that means the company committed fraud and other crimes.
These lawyers may be afraid that the crappy vaccines are not endangering the public in that manner because non-existent viruses cannot become worse.
They would accuse the people on this side of aiding the defense of the big company. To which I can say that a bad attack tactic probably is more of a defense for the other side than simply telling the truth.
Hey Mike. I have a question. What is the maximum magnification that is able to be obtained when a doctor/surgeon uses a scope, like an endoscopy procedure? I imagine that technology is in the works, but I am curious to what could be seen without taking a sample out of a patient. Love your work, thanks for the video :)
Thank you for this very fine overview of some of the main issues with virology and the theses which underpin it. Though it may tend towards the technical side, it would be yet still useful to hear more about the problematics which attend the use of cell cultures in the so called 'isolation process'. Additionally, it would be similarly interesting to learn more about the various other forms of microscopy to which you allude. Finally, one question which has occurred to me on several occasions you may well be able to address (and in a sense you already have implicitly vis-a-vis the question of sample pertubation): Does not any centrifugal process apply forces to the material being analyzed that are potentially destructive to the very elements of that material which are being sought? Again, thank you for your efforts and presentations.
Hi Mike, thanks for the presentation. I would love to see a deep dive from a devils advocate perspective. Ie what are the ostensible reasons given for both why true isolation cant be achieved with density gradients or any other method and how they rationalize that this doesn't matter. Dr Cowan pointed out recently that exosomes can be isolated therefor viruses (if they were something different) should be able to be also. I have heard several times from "the team" that there is no technical reason why something as small as viruses are supposed to be cannot be isolated. What is your view on this?
I love the work of the no virus team but its hard to know that all explanations for the positions virology takes are fully understood by the team, as there is no dialogue between them and virologists.
I think this leads to circular reasoning from the no virus side too.. Ie a recent interview suggested 'if they had the samples from human patients that we are requesting then they would be signing it from the rooftops. But this is not necessarily true if the other side truly believe that what is asked for in the FOIA requests is not required for proof of viruses. One example of where no dialogue leads to second guessing of peoples motives.
Thank you! Excellent! Would you kindly consider the following topics: contagion? More on terrain theory, are viruses just dead cell debri? Why we all get sick in the same house at the same time?
If you're having problems watching the video embedded on this page, here is the link to Odysee. For some reason, clicking the link to it posted on this page led to an empty page, ditto with Rumble.
Good synopsis of what's wrong with the average person's perception of what it means to "see a virus." I've encountered lots of people claiming to have seen viruses moving via electron microscopes, just pure BS given what's needed to do electron microscopy. Thanks, Mike, and congratulations on this launch.
>> Did you know that viruses cannot be seen under a standard light microscope? Their size would be too small to see even under the highest magnification. Over the last few years I found out that many people didn’t realize that. <<
My question is, even if individual virus particles cannot be seen under a light microscope, should not it be possible to identify a viral *mass* under a light microscope as it increases in number, gradually filling up all the space within the cell? And shouldn't it be possible to see the cell explode as the burgeoning mass finally compromises the membrane's structural integrity? And shouldn't it be fair game to ask virologists to provide footage of both phenomena as proof of virus-induced CPE?
Thank you for this important video. Please feel free to talk about anything you want, and at leisure. Your info is always on point, and of high value; also given your background.
NEVER in the history of mankind has injecting poisons into your body given you better health.Quite the opposite. They’ve ALL maimed and killed. Read and learn the history of this barbaric act:
There are many others, they’re just a few.Finding the truth isn’t that hard.
We’ve known for well over 150 years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.
Thanks Sir, I'm in the viruses are an illusion camp...thanks for your honesty...ICU RN x 40 years much in Critical care...4 children 30yrs old avg age unvaccinated...Viruses are a fraud...Measles 95 % disappeared when they came out with the magic vacccine....same for polio......Environmental causation likely
Very helpful- keep it up Mike!
Mike, I've been following Kaufman, Cowan, Sam and Mark Bailey, the great investigative reporter- Jon Rappaport and many others for the past two years. More and more people are entering the no virus camp. I'm encouraged by this momentum.
Looking back at germ theory, I find it incredible that over a hundred years ago, a bunch of elites had the foresight to see the potential for controlling others through this mechanism. This is on par with central banking and the fractional reserve system. An inquiry into a detailed origin of germ theory would be fascinating and would garner my support. There had to be financial backers to Pasteur while simultaneously working to discredit Bechamp. But I'm enthralled by the genius, albeit evil, at play here!
I'll be reading your posts. And at some point will subscribe to your service.
Thanks for the presentation. I enjoyed it.
I have many, many, many questions. But I will limit myself to two.
One question. We "know" (or we believe we know) that pathogenic viruses do not exist, because the evidence that supports the claim that they do has been refuted. Yet the idea of a virus is believed by almost everyone, to the point that they believe, perhaps without evidence, that there are synthetic viruses. Is it possible to make synthetic viruses if real viruses do not exist?
It seems wrong to try to explain a totally man-made agent of disease in terms of something that does not exist in nature.
"This object is analogous to that other object that does not exist."
Another way to present the same question: have humans managed to create an organic particle that is replication-capable according to the current understanding of the "central dogma of genetics" but has no ancestor in nature?
The second question is more speculative. I see the majority of scientists believe (they hate that word, for some reason) that natural, pathogenic viruses exist and have always existed. They even claim that humans and all life forms have co-evolved with viruses.
This majority of learned people must have taken the time to review the evidence, just to be sure, and have found it good enough.
There is a minority of people who think the opposite: they have reviewed the evidence and find it lacking.
My speculative question is: what is one group seeing that the other group cannot or will not see?
It's too easy, and perhaps true, that the "love of money" is involved in some ways. Or perhaps ignorance, intellectual laziness, fear.
About fear: there are lawyers in multi-year long lawsuits against big companies claiming that their crappy vaccines force natural viruses to become more virulent, more pathogenic and deadly, and that means the company committed fraud and other crimes.
These lawyers may be afraid that the crappy vaccines are not endangering the public in that manner because non-existent viruses cannot become worse.
They would accuse the people on this side of aiding the defense of the big company. To which I can say that a bad attack tactic probably is more of a defense for the other side than simply telling the truth.
Hi Mike... thank you for your sincere presentation. I sent you an email. I look forward to a reply.
Hey Mike. I have a question. What is the maximum magnification that is able to be obtained when a doctor/surgeon uses a scope, like an endoscopy procedure? I imagine that technology is in the works, but I am curious to what could be seen without taking a sample out of a patient. Love your work, thanks for the video :)
Thank you for this very fine overview of some of the main issues with virology and the theses which underpin it. Though it may tend towards the technical side, it would be yet still useful to hear more about the problematics which attend the use of cell cultures in the so called 'isolation process'. Additionally, it would be similarly interesting to learn more about the various other forms of microscopy to which you allude. Finally, one question which has occurred to me on several occasions you may well be able to address (and in a sense you already have implicitly vis-a-vis the question of sample pertubation): Does not any centrifugal process apply forces to the material being analyzed that are potentially destructive to the very elements of that material which are being sought? Again, thank you for your efforts and presentations.
Hi Mike, thanks for the presentation. I would love to see a deep dive from a devils advocate perspective. Ie what are the ostensible reasons given for both why true isolation cant be achieved with density gradients or any other method and how they rationalize that this doesn't matter. Dr Cowan pointed out recently that exosomes can be isolated therefor viruses (if they were something different) should be able to be also. I have heard several times from "the team" that there is no technical reason why something as small as viruses are supposed to be cannot be isolated. What is your view on this?
I love the work of the no virus team but its hard to know that all explanations for the positions virology takes are fully understood by the team, as there is no dialogue between them and virologists.
I think this leads to circular reasoning from the no virus side too.. Ie a recent interview suggested 'if they had the samples from human patients that we are requesting then they would be signing it from the rooftops. But this is not necessarily true if the other side truly believe that what is asked for in the FOIA requests is not required for proof of viruses. One example of where no dialogue leads to second guessing of peoples motives.
Thanks for your work
Thank you! Excellent! Would you kindly consider the following topics: contagion? More on terrain theory, are viruses just dead cell debri? Why we all get sick in the same house at the same time?
Thank you!
Thank you for watching. Sure I’d be happy to try and address those questions.
If you're having problems watching the video embedded on this page, here is the link to Odysee. For some reason, clicking the link to it posted on this page led to an empty page, ditto with Rumble.
https://odysee.com/@stillinthestorm:3/A_Virus_Primer:6
Still has issues, but at least playable for me.
Good synopsis of what's wrong with the average person's perception of what it means to "see a virus." I've encountered lots of people claiming to have seen viruses moving via electron microscopes, just pure BS given what's needed to do electron microscopy. Thanks, Mike, and congratulations on this launch.
Hola, Mike. You wrote:
>> Did you know that viruses cannot be seen under a standard light microscope? Their size would be too small to see even under the highest magnification. Over the last few years I found out that many people didn’t realize that. <<
My question is, even if individual virus particles cannot be seen under a light microscope, should not it be possible to identify a viral *mass* under a light microscope as it increases in number, gradually filling up all the space within the cell? And shouldn't it be possible to see the cell explode as the burgeoning mass finally compromises the membrane's structural integrity? And shouldn't it be fair game to ask virologists to provide footage of both phenomena as proof of virus-induced CPE?
Thank you for this important video. Please feel free to talk about anything you want, and at leisure. Your info is always on point, and of high value; also given your background.
Kind regards. :)
NEVER in the history of mankind has injecting poisons into your body given you better health.Quite the opposite. They’ve ALL maimed and killed. Read and learn the history of this barbaric act:
-The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations https://a.co/d/cfvx9Q6 https://rumble.com/v1wxx5q-nephrologist-dr-suzanne-humphries-vaccines-have-never-been-safe.html
-Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/coVuit4
- George William Winterburn, PhD, MD, The Value of Vaccination: A Non-partisan Review of Its History and Results, 1886 https://archive.org/details/64940640R.nlm.nih.gov
- History and Pathology of Vaccination, Edgar R. Crookshank, 1889 https://archive.org/details/historypathology02crooiala
- Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination. A Strange Chapter of Medical History, 1889 https://archive.org/details/b21357067
There are many others, they’re just a few.Finding the truth isn’t that hard.
We’ve known for well over 150 years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.
Thanks Mike this was succinct and very informative and authoritative. I just heard about you today, linked from Mike Yeadon.
I look forward to hearing more.